Tuesday, January 8, 2013

What I Think Hell Is - Some Reflections on a Difficult Subject

Hell is not something we hear about too much anymore it seems.  With the exception of the handful of lunatic fire-and-brimstone fundamentalist street preachers ranting about the word and who they think are going there (as if they can judge), I hardly ever hear about Hell unless I read older works.  Perhaps, like death, it is something the modern world simply does not want to hear about anymore - I think this has much to do with the fact that the modern world has made its own artificial hell in the meantime.

It is a complicated issue, this notion of Hell.  I have often wondered many days and nights why on earth a loving God would send anyone to Hell.  I cannot approach the issue as a theologian might, nor can I speak with any kind of authority on the issue - I can only say what I think on it all.  Here is my opinion on the subject, for better or worse.

Hell is the ultimate rejection of love, for God is love.  If we have truly rejected God, then we have truly rejected the source of all love, life, and the rest.  In my opinion, we send ourselves to Hell through our constant rejection of love - yes, the Scriptures say that God commands us to depart into the fire, but it is we ourselves who have already chosen it by our rejection of love, and love itself is to be found in God.  As Metropolitan Kallistos Ware writes, "Christ is the judge; and yet, from another point of view, it is we who pronounce judgment on ourselves.  If anyone is in hell, it is not because God has imprisoned him there, but because that is where he himself has chosen to be"1.  In the Dialogue of St. Catherine of Siena, we find it written that "they make their way to hell"2.

There is some truth in the words of those who say that "hell would be hanging out with a bunch of boring church-goers" - sarcasm aside, it's kind of true.  I don't think those in Hell would ever want to be in heaven.

Dostoevsky writes that Hell is "The suffering of no longer being able to love"3.  I think he is correct.  Forget the costumed devils and flames - Hell is something far deeper, far worse, far more awful than simply some imagined image of a devilish figure poking someone with a pitchfork.  It is an existence separated from God, who is the source of all love.  Imagine an existence where love is non-existent in any sense, and I think we can come up with a notion of what Hell really is.  Where there is no love, there can only be hate.

1 - The Orthodox Way, epilogue
2 - The Dialogue, 48
3 - The Brothers Karamazov, II:3

7 comments:

  1. Jason,

    You maybe right, but I always remember that Our Lady of Fatima showed the hell to the children, and they got horrified. Maybe, that was just a representation of Hell, but who knows.

    But, I could not agree more when you say that one choose to go to hell when denying Christ (love).

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would say the state of any soul who has rejected Love is pretty horrifying. That would be enough to scare the children at Fatima. All Beauty is gone from those souls, too. And, I'm sure they suffer, just like the demons suffer, even if they chose to lose those things, like the demons chose to lose them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think if anyone has ever suffered a serious burn or even had smoke in their eyes, the notion of everlasting consuming fire is something that strikes terror even into someone who is very worldly. Many people Love evil, no one loves being shoved into an oven and turning it on high.

    Isaiah 66:24, "And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcasses of the men that have transgressed against me: for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh."

    Matthew 13:50 “furnace of fire…weeping and gnashing of teeth”

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hell is the absence of love, but it might not start out that way. It may simply start off with preferring something of this world to God and not actual hatred of God.

    So Hell might just God giving us our desires, namely to continue on this world forever. After 100 years, most people are ready to leave this life but they can live on for a while longer. After 1000, most of us would be bored out of our skull since no matter what we love in this world, there is a limit since the goods of this world are finite. For example, no matter how much you love chocolate, after a year of eating nothing but chocolate, you'd be sick at even the sight of chocolate. After 10,000 years, we'd hate everything in this world with a passion. After 100,000 years our hatred would be so refined that they would start to approach that of the devil.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Look up THE RIVER OF FIRE by Dr. Alexandre Kalimiros.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have a quote here from Cardinal Ratzinger in the interview that was published as God and the World. "...what being damned really means is this: taking no pleasure in anything anymore, liking nothing and no one, and being liked by no one. Being robbed of any capacity for loving and excluded from the sphere in which loving is possible -- that is absolute emptiness, in which a person exists in contradiction to his own nature, and his life is totally ruined."
    Of course, even if he had been pope at the time, that would not be a dogmatic statement, but it does seem to me to be the essence of hell. It seems to me that such a state will leave one alone for ever, even if there are others around you. I have different images myself at different times of what would be a suitable hell, and, while I can't say no one will go there -- after all, the fallen angels are there, why not humans? -- I have to believe that most of us will be saved, even if it means a long time in purgatory first.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sr. Josefa Menendez was given the grace of being in Hell, reportedly. Here's a synopsis of her experience http://www.newjerusalem.com/appeal.htm

    ReplyDelete